Friday, July 27, 2007

[IE] PU suspends five students for ragging



Chandigarh, July 26: Five third year students of University Institute of Engineering Technology (UIET), Panjab University, were expelled from their hostel and suspended from the institute for allegedly ragging two first year students. The Central Monitoring Committee of the university took the decision.

The suspended students include three students of Electronics and Communication Engineering - Assem Yash Bhatiya, Anil Santlani and Abhimanyu Kapoor, while the other two are students of Information Technology - Ravi Kant Swami and Amit Soni. They were ragging the freshers in Hostel No. 2.

The suspended students claimed that they were just asking the freshers for their introduction. However, Dean Students Welfare Prof Naval Kishore said the hostel warden called him on Wednesday night and told him about freshers being ragged. “The two students who were being ragged also complained against them,” Prof Kishore said.

The monitoring committee was constituted recently to curb ragging on the campus. The committee decided that the students would remain suspended till further order. A copy of the decision has been sent to the Director, UIET, and the warden concerned for immediate action. The two freshers have left for their homes.

Meanwhile, the president of the Students Organisation of Panjab University, Harpreet Singh Multani, said expelling students from the hostel and suspending them was a harsh decision. “We will give a memorandum to the Vice-Chancellor tomorrow then we will start an agitation,” he said.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

ragging is a crime against those with less power and authority. And those with power get away with it So it has to be stopped.

Anonymous said...

Nowadays the freshers are taking the unfair advantage of the fact that supreme court has set stringent action against the students found ragging.
The freshers intentonally clash with there seniors to earn fame n later threaten the seniors to complaint against them for ragging.
The concerned authorities should check the veracity of the complaint before taking any action and in case if complaint is fraudlent then equally strict action must be taken against the complainant